Uncategorized
Goodbye Van Jones
by admin on Sep.06, 2009, under Politics, Uncategorized
Yesterday, 9/5/2009, Van Jones resigned as the Green Jobs Czar. If you are unsure what that czar means: A male monarch or emperor (especially of Russia prior to 1917), or a person having great power.
Jones left crying foul, claiming that he has been the victim of a smear campaign with people inventing lies and distortions about him. I’ve been listening to some of his critics lately, such as Glen Beck and Fox News in General. Nothing Glen Beck said about Van Jones was invented by him. Beck showed videos and documents for evey claim he made about Jones.
Jones obviously does not like white people. According to Jones immigrants are allowed into into the United States so we (whites) can spray poison on them. Am I, a white person, not supposed to feel insulted by this lie aimed at distorting my image in the eyes of others? Jones said this on a video. No one made this up.
Jones refers to the animals on this planet as our brother and sister species. What? Animals are not our brother and sister species.
“Don’t stop there, don’t stop there”. That’s Jones’ mantra. He seems to enjoy working a crowd up with his perception of reality and then creating the illusion that his vision extends far beyond what he has just revealed on a subject. Jones constantly reverts to the white man is evil, black man (and all other races) is victim theme in order to gain support for people thinking that he exists to shift the wealth in this country away fro these evil people who have taken it from them and “Give them the wealth”. According to Jones, the new focus on Green Energy is all about shifting the wealth in order to make up for broken treaties of the past. Jones made these statements at the Power Shift ‘09 Conference in March. He’s really using this idea of new Green Jobs as a mask for redistributing wealth in this country. Finding cleaner energy is a good thing, but that is not what Jones is truly concerned about. He’s a socialist looking for an opportunity to restructure the power in the United States and do it in a way that appears to be for the betterment of us all..
Jones signed a petition which calls for an investigation of the Bush administration as co-conspirators of the 9/11 attacks in 2004. Today he claims that the ideas on the petition do not reflect his beliefs then or now. So why did he sign the petition? He says he should have read it more carefully. Does that mean he will continue to give his signature and approval to issues he has not researched? Or does it mean that he will continue to deny responsibility for his actions when they interfere with a more current and more personally important agenda?
By his own statements Jones reveals himself as an extreme radical, racist, propagandist, and divisor of classes.
By selecting him for such a high post, our president, Barack Obama, reveals his continuing inability to make sound decisions. Or maybe the president thought that as they were when he was elected, most people here in the U.S. were still asleep and no one would notice this continuing move to drive our country to socialism. Perhaps he made a bad decision either way. Please wake up citizens of the United States. Maybe Jones was just a decoy to divert attention from Obama’s socialist agenda.
I’m glad he’s gone. I hope and pray that the other leftists in the current administration can be stopped before they do great harm to our country.
If you think Obama is doing a good job and is concerned about the future of our country, then ask yourself this: Why is our president spending trillions of dollars that don’t really exist without having done one thing to repair the economy? Shouldn’t we get the economy on track before we start the spending? The current administration is behaving like a teenage kid with no job who just received a credit card with a $10,000 limit. It’s not too difficult to see how the teenager would get in trouble in that situation, but shouldn’t our president be capable of making a more sound decision?
Big Words With No Weight (Condemning the Actions of Countries)
by admin on May.25, 2009, under Uncategorized
Kim Jong-il inherited the rule of North Korea from his father. He has never really accomplished anything noteworthy on his own his entire life. He seems to think of himself as a god. Is a public, verbal condemnation of a narcissistic individual like this really likely to have any effect on his actions? Maybe his next tantrum will be worse because he did not get his way this time, but certainly the condemnation will have no positive effect.
The latest condemnation is not the first one the world has issued against Kim Jong-il, and the previous condemnations resulted in no positive change either. Just last month, April 5, North Korea launched an intercontinental rocket. The U.S. had threatened to shoot it down but instead took no action at all. Wow, Kim Jong-il must really be growing frightened by all of this condemnation. North Korea conducted its first nuclear test at the end of 2006 drawing international condemnation. Judging by the events since then, especially those of the past couple of months, it seems safe to say that condemnations have no effect on North Korea.
Who else has the U.S, other countries, and the United Nations condemned over the past couple of decades?
18 September 2001 – United Nations issues condemnation for the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Can someone explain what purpose that served?
In 2005, the United States and others publicly condemned Mahmud Ahmadinejad for stating that Israel should be wiped off the map and that the Holocaust is a myth.
During Jimmy Carter’s term as president he issued several condemnations against Iran and its leadership. It would take an entire book to explore that issue, but it’s safe to say that his condemnations served no good purpose.
The United States is not alone in it zeal to publicly condemn the actions of other countries. Iran has demanded (December, 2006) that the United Nations condemn Israel’s nuclear program. (Israel has never officially declared that it has a nuclear program.) Iran probably did this to provide itself with an excuse for its own nuclear program when the United Nations failed to issue the condemnation.
This list is nowhere near complete. The point of this post is simply to ask the question: “What is the purpose in publicly condemning something that you are not going to do anything about?” Constantly mouthing off and then not backing up the condemnation serves to strengthen your enemy’s resolve and make you look like a wimp. Well, the current president doesn’t look like he has ever curled a barbell in his life; he probably has the skinniest arms of any president in our history, so I guess it figures that he would enjoy acting tough, knowing that he will never have to tell any one of these people to their face (without his bodyguards) that he thinks their behavior is not satisfactory.
To the president, the United Nations and everyone else in a high position: Stop the Lip Service! No more condemnations without action to back it up. If you are not serious then just keep your mouth shut.
Who can say, "I have made my heart pure; I am clean from my sin"? (Proverbs 20:9, ESV)
